
The debate goes on
There is little doubt that BlackBerry is a market leader within the
legal industry – early adopters led the way, with many firms hot on
their heels and soon we were reading of the so called ‘crackberry
phenomenon’.
Initially BlackBerry had a very distinct advantage, being the only
wireless solution to offer true ‘push’ email, that integrated seamlessly
with our desktop. However, with the launch of service pack 2 for
Microsoft Exchange 2003, it appeared that Windows Mobile devices would
pose a serious challenge to BlackBerry’s predominant USP.
Push email was now available on a platform already familiar to a vast
proportion of the working population. In addition, for those companies
already using Exchange 2003, there was no additional software to
purchase, whilst compatible smartphones and PDAs offered widespread
choice to end users.
Windows Mobile devices also packed appeal by providing the ability to
not just view but to edit documents too. Whilst this sounded useful, in
more practical terms would this actually be of primary importance for
many fee earners. BlackBerry instead offered arguably higher levels
of security, as well as greater administrative, over the air and commercial
control. Perhaps the race wasn’t quite so clear cut after all.
At the BigHand User Conference last September, mobile data was a
prominent theme, with the launch of a mobility module for the market
leading BigHand3 digital dictation system* and delegates were asked a
few very pertinent questions during an interactive session. Whilst there
have been numerous surveys regarding this very subject, lets look at a
snapshot of the opinions of your colleagues and peers.
Q: BlackBerry Smartphone versus Windows Mobile?
A: BlackBerry Smartphone 67% Windows Mobile 33%
Q: BlackBerry Smartphone versus Windows Mobile in 2012?
A: BlackBerry Smartphone 45% Windows Mobile 55%
Q: If you had to choose just one method of digital dictation mobile
working for authors would it be:
